Our website is currently undergoing maintenance and a major layout update. You may experience occasional issues or downtime over the next week.
Mobile viewing may be affected—please use a desktop device or check back after the update is complete.
Judging & Global Engagement
Across international awards, fellowships, and selection committees, I have been entrusted with the responsibility of evaluating ideas, institutions, and individuals driving change across journalism, technology, education, and social leadership. These roles have allowed me to engage closely with global narratives of excellence, ethics, and innovation — while reinforcing the principles of fairness and judgment rooted in democratic responsibility.
Over the years, I have contributed to evaluating 300+ submissions and nominations globally, spanning journalism, technology, education, social leadership, and innovation ecosystems.
This work reflects more than recognition — it reflects trust.
Global Judging & Evaluation Timeline
Global Philosophy of Evaluation & Justice
Judgment is not power — it is responsibility.
To evaluate is not to rank perfection, but to recognize potential shaped by context, access, and struggle. Every decision influences visibility, opportunity, and legitimacy. This is why I treat evaluation as a duty: a process that must be guided not by authority but by fairness, humility, and justice.
Justice begins not in verdicts, but in the fairness of our evaluation.